If consititutive power is social and domination is unjust, isn't that all you need besides individualism, the power to act or not act in society. While 'power to act' may be a Hegelian slip as it can be interpreted such that it exposes a contradiction (framework inconsistency), each folie a deux is emotional; and its gaps are aberrations in error-prediction nuclei.
Such gap is, rather than a crushing blow to selfhood, a chance to expand ones personhood by growing ones latent propitious archetypes, as emotions' reaction is specific to crowd's reaction as litigary; and although a bummer may sting of deeply as separation from general power, such social bond entails influence - you can supplant the action by tapping into Network, exchanging mental operations with many intellects!
https://www.cs.drexel.edu/~zl54/Classes/cs680/Reading%20Assignments/Crossings%20-%20Volume%201,%20Issue%201%20-%20Pierre%20Levy.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment